Where cost, duty and liability actually sit
Price is rarely the reason a merchandise order becomes expensive. Classification, duty, packaging and the point at which risk transfers are the reasons, and all four are decided in documents that can be fixed before the goods are made.
Classification. Customs classification determines duty, and classification is determined by the goods as presented, not by what the marketing team calls them. Inside the EAEU customs union, an apparel order is commonly declared under headings such as HS 6109.10 for knitted or crocheted t-shirts of cotton, 6110.20 for cotton jerseys and pullovers, 6203.42 and 6203.43 for men's cotton trousers, 6205.20 for men's cotton shirts, and 6505.00 for knitted or crocheted hats. Non-apparel items sit elsewhere: 6912.00 for ceramic tableware, 7323.92 for stainless steel household articles, 4202.92 for bags with an outer surface of textile materials, 6305.20 for bags of non-woven polypropylene fabric, 4820.10 for registers and note pads, 9608.99 for other pens, and 8504.40 for static converters and power-supply units. A lithium power bank generally follows 8507.60, the heading for lithium-ion accumulators, and moves with the test documentation issued under the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, Tests 38.3. The practical point is that classification follows the physical item and its composition, so a supplier quoting "tote bag" is quoting a marketing category. The buyer who needs a defensible number asks for the composition, the weight, and the material of each component, and asks before the sample is approved rather than after the declaration is filed.
Value and duty treatment. Goods moving inside the EAEU customs union cross no external customs border, which removes the export and import clearance steps, the duty assessment and most of the document volume that a non-union supplier generates. That is a genuine operational advantage for Armenia, Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, and it is why regional production and regional sourcing exist. It is not, however, a reason to stop classifying properly: the declaration still has to be accurate, the origin evidence still matters for any preferential treatment that is later claimed, and a mistake made inside the union is discovered at the next audit rather than at the border. Arrivals from outside the union are a different matter entirely — duty rate depends on classification and on origin, and the applicable rate can only be stated once both are fixed, which is why a quotation that states a landed cost without naming the classification is a quotation that will move when the declaration is prepared. VAT in Armenia is charged at the standard rate of 20% on most goods and services, and specific categories, including certain printed promotional material, carry their own exemption rules that change over time; the treatment should be confirmed against the current code rather than inferred from a previous order.
Incoterms and the transfer of risk. Incoterms 2020 allocate delivery, transfer of risk and cost between seller and buyer, and the clause is where the two most expensive ambiguities live. FCA is the correct default for containerised or consolidated cargo because it hands over at the carrier's terminal at origin, which is a defined event with a timestamp; FOB, which survives in older templates, is defined in terms of goods passing onto the vessel and works poorly for anything that travels in a container that is handed over before it is loaded. DAP places risk at the named destination, unloaded; DDP additionally places duty and clearance on the seller, which is convenient for a buyer who lacks a customs function and expensive for a seller who mis-states the classification on which the landed cost was calculated. Whichever term is chosen, the contract should also state the delivery window, the Incoterms version in force at the date of the contract, the point at which the carrier is nominated, and the carrier's liability limit. Transit insurance is a separate decision and a separate cost line; it should be priced as one and not assumed inside a delivered price.
Packaging as a liability. Packaging is routinely under-specified and routinely causes loss. A merchandise consignment is a collection of small, high-density, easily misrouted items, and the standard cartons are sized for industrial loads rather than for the inside dimensions of a retail wardrobe or an office cabinet. The specification should state the packing requirement per SKU — individually poly-bagged, size-separated, boxed by size with the carton labelled by size, or packed by delegate set — because a mixed carton is what produces the lost size that then becomes a claim. Labelling should carry the buyer as consignee, a purchase order or reference number, the carton sequence, and a business description accurate enough for customs but silent about any unannounced matter. Where goods are personalised, the outer carton should not describe the contents; the risk of revealing a name in a misrouted carton is small but real, and the cost of a generic outer carton is negligible.